
U.S. should better industrial
base
All of us should
support Purdue Students Against Sweatshops. As a matter of fact, Congress
should pass a bill mandating that American companies pay everyone they
employ minimum wage and that their employees should have insurance. Furthermore,
we shouldn't allow the importation of anything that anyone produces who
does not provide these minimums. Don't get me wrong, I don't really care
about those workers. I just want to end the exportation of jobs by American
companies. If we raise the cost of doing business overseas, the companies
will stay home and provide jobs for Americans. It is the lack of a good
industrial base that is at the root of many problems in the U.S. While
our industrial base was supreme, black Americans and others were coming
closer to being united with the rest. All Americans could count on getting
a "good" job and thus paying taxes which in turn funded schools. Today,
a significant portion of our population has no means to get a quality
education because they cannot pay taxes. This does not allow for equal
opportunity, especially in poorer neighborhoods. Since minorities have
higher rates of poverty, this equals disadvantages for certain minorities.
Since minorities are less educated, they seem dumber. This in turn feeds
racism. Poor Americans are blamed for not getting the education that they
cannot get.
Let's get out there
and support Purdue Students Against Sweatshops.
Manuel A. Paulet
Purdue alumnus
Lack of courtesy upsets student
I was in the Stewart
Center waiting patiently to use the phone. I waited ... and I waited ...
and I waited. Ten minutes went by so I decided to go to another phone.
At the next phone site, I had to listen to two people chat on about meaningless
things, while three people waited patiently to get their turn. As the
other two girls and I chatted about how rude the two guys using the phone
were, one guy had the nerve to say "Go find another phone" after we mentioned
the fact that there were three other people waiting. The fact is that
the campus phones are for everyone. When you see other people waiting,
the polite thing to do is to get off the phone. So for those of you who
just have to be rude and have conversations about what you're going to
buy for dinner or what you need to buy at the mall, think first about
how you would feel waiting on a phone for 20 minutes. Better yet save
your meaningless conversations for when you get home.
Julia Davis
junior, School
of Liberal Arts
Christians view prayer as
necessity
Earlier this semester
I had heard of some students' objection to a professor praying to himself
before a lecture. These students had considered this discrimination. I
do not consider a professor saying a prayer in a class, either large or
small, to be a discriminating act. In our society, it might be classified
as an "expression". As a Christian, prayer is a necessity.
In the university
setting and the rest of the world's stage, we are exposed to many views
some wrong, some right and some just different. Even though we
may not agree with what we are exposed to, we should take it into account
and make our opinions or decisions accordingly. I am sad that prayer has
offended some, and I sincerely hope that changes with time. However, please
look at other viewpoints open-mindedly. As a University student studying
science, I have sat through numerous lectures concerning evolution. I
do not believe in human evolution theory, but my being exposed to such
view, I have analyzed the facts more closely and grasped onto my beliefs
more strongly. I suggest sitting back, smiling, not letting the nuances
of life bite at you, and personally, I suggest praying.
Joanne Mosher
graduate student
Purdue should block Napstar
use
Sadly, I discovered
that Purdue will not block the use of Napster by students using the Purdue
computer networks. Copying and distributing copyrighted material without
permission from the copyright holder is illegal and use of Napster to
do this is prohibited as clearly stated in the Napster terms of use agreement.
You would have to be delusional to think that no Purdue students have
used Purdue computer resources and Napster to engage in the clearly illegal
activity of obtaining copyrighted material without the required permission.
By continuing to allow the school's computer resources to be used in this
manner sends the message that Purdue is willing to turn a blind eye to
illegal activities as long as it makes the students happy. Each time someone
uses Purdue computers to obtain the latest new music without having to
buy it from a local retailer, it tells a tale of how important the community
we claim to be a part of really is. By allowing this to happen, Purdue
is taking away from the livelihood of our community and tarnishing the
Purdue name. The Purdue administration has a responsibility to uphold
Purdues good name. I am proud to be a Purdue Boilermaker but am
angered that I may also be considered a Purdue Bootlegger.
Steven Gale
freshman, University
Division
Student ponders homosexual
genes
I read with great
interest a letter published in The Exponent, which claimed that homosexuality
is not a choice, but rather is genetic.
So, I began thinking
about this "genetic" code and came to this decision. Homosexuality is
the single-most dangerous genetic defect ever. It could wipe out the species.
Think about it. Those individuals who have this defect are unwilling to
reproduce. Now, this may lead those of you that are forward thinking to
come to the conclusion that the defect would eliminate itself when all
of those with the defect fail to reproduce. However, many people with
this defect may reproduce before the gene manifests itself, therefore
passing the gene onto their offspring.
Mankind's only hope
is that this gene is recessive.
Andrew Moeschberger
sophomore, School
of Education
Student supports hunger strikers
I would like to thank
those who participated in the hunger strike for bringing the issue of
sweatshops/monitoring organizations to my attention. Like a good teacher
whose lessons a student quietly absorbs and uses years later, your influence
may be even greater than that which is immediately evident. Not only was
I personally affected, I also witnessed several discussions among faculty,
staff and students. Whether or not these individuals agreed with your
goal of joining the Worker Rights Consortium, they were all influenced
by your efforts in some way. They were also respectful of your opinions
and impressed by the sacrifice required. This is why I was shocked to
learn about others who held picnics near your camp or heckled your group.
Such individuals certainly have a right to disagree, but I am embarrassed
for them for their basic lack of maturity and respect. Please be aware
that there are others, including myself, who were moved by your efforts
and who may be a bit quicker to help support (or lead) similar efforts
in the future.
Laura Pritchett
graduate student
Boy Scouts want to protect
boys
I am an assistant
scoutmaster for a Boy Scout troop. I went through Basic Leader Training
last spring and learned the following about the homosexuality issue:
If a scout (under
18 years old) claims to be homosexual, no one really cares! From what
I understand, the boy is just asked to keep this issue to himself. After
all, heterosexuals aren't expected to tell everyone that they are heterosexual.
Plus, most people this young do not know enough about sexual orientation
to really "label" themselves as heterosexual or homosexual.
If a leader (18 years
old or older) claims to be homosexual, that's when people worry. Think
about it. That would be like having a man for a Girl Scout leader or a
woman for a Boy Scout leader. Granted, I do know a few women scoutmasters
but that is quite rare. My point is that a homosexual leader would be
required to work closely with a group of young boys at least once a week,
about one weekend per month and maybe for a couple weeks in the summer.
That would be like letting a heterosexual man spend a week with a group
of young girls and asking him not to be aroused. Would you want your 16-year-old
daughter spending a week camping with a heterosexual man who could be
as young as 18 years old? I highly doubt this. The only reason the Boy
Scouts of America looks unfavorably upon homosexual leaders is for the
protection of the boys.
I am getting tired
of hearing stuff about discrimination in the Boy Scouts, so I hope this
clears things up.
T.J. Fech
freshman, School
of Education
Liberal media disgusts student
I am writing to express
my disgust with today's liberal news media. I am appalled at the lack
of honesty with which it reports stories and the one-sided liberal viewpoints
the average newspaper takes. Why is it that reporters consistently throw
Mickey Mouse questions at liberal politicians (i.e. How is Socks the cat
doing?) while completely ignoring the hardline issues that the public
wants to know about. Why is it that reporters who ask real questions have
an uncanny knack for getting fired? The Exponent columnists are no exception.
If there is an immoral, atheistic or anti-patriotic view to be held, they
will gladly embrace it because they have been trained to having
learned by example. However, I will give The Exponent this: it is an excellent
training ground for future newspaper personnel. The Exponent columnists
will fit right into the fascist media empire when they graduate. I guess
what I am trying to say to the students of Purdue is that we shouldn't
allow the media to trample on our rights to free speech. If you know the
truth about an issue that the liberal news media chooses to skirt, let
other people know about it by any means possible. Write a letter to the
editor, distribute flyers or start an e-mail chain letter. Better yet,
start up a newspaper that isn't run by degenerates.
This has been my
overly humble opinion.
Casey B. Neidlinger
junior, School
of Technology
Song comments on Americans
Corey Swartz wrote
that in nominating the "South Park" song "Blame Canada," the Academy Awards
was insulting Canadians. This requires that the song itself be insulting
to Canadians, which it isn't. "Blame Canada" is nothing less (and everything
more) than an embellished commentary on those Americans who seek solace
in blaming others for their own problems. Using Canada's probity as the
focal point ices the cake. Our great neighbor to the north likely edged
out the Boy Scouts for top spot. I can say this with reasonable certainty
as I am "half" Canadian and have spent most of my life there. Compared
to Americans, Canadians are stolid when it comes to national pride. It's
teeming; it just doesn't get out. Interpreting this song as an attempt
to dent the Canadian shield is a mistake. So remember, in the spirit of
anthem, the next time you find yourself choking on a "jelly," BLAME CANADA,
eh!
Peter Sharp
graduate student
Student questions organization
I have done a small
amount of research into sweatshops and have found that there are many
organizations devoted to stopping sweatshops. Here is a partial list of
those organizations.
National Labor
Committee
International
Labor Rights Fund
Child Labor
Coalition
Sweatshop
Watch
Campaign for
Labor Rights
Co-op America
Feminists
Against Sweatshops
United Consumers
Action Network Against Sweatshops
National Mobilization
Against Sweatshops
Clean Clothes
Campaign
United Students
Against Sweatshops
Plus, of course,
the Worker Rights Consortium. I have not studied all of these groups in
depth. I assume that some of them are good organizations that are worthy
of our support, while others may be either rabidly liberal or rabidly
conservative groups with whom Purdue does not wish to be affiliated. To
my knowledge, our hunger strikers have not given any reasons why the (Worker
Rights Consortium) ought to be Purdue's chosen affiliate.
Nor have they given
any explanation of the following clause in the (Worker Rights Consortium's)
Companion Document, dated Feb. 9, under the heading "Verification Policies:
"The organizations
who will be reporting worker complaints ... are human rights and religious
organizations based in apparel-producing regions."
Is it wise for Purdue,
a state-supported, non-sectarian institution, to be held accountable to
religious organizations? The answer may be yes, but this is a decision
that needs to be carefully considered, and not under the pressure of dozens
of students starving themselves in an attempt to manipulate the administration.
Joel Bruhn
Purdue staff
Students outline suggestions
We are writing this
letter to applaud the recent editorials opposing homosexual involvement
in the Boy Scouts. It is inspirational to see that students on this campus
are fighting the trend toward political correctness and helping to usher
in a new age of intolerance. The Bible says it is wrong to be gay. Of
course the Bible also says "Do not judge and you will not be judged. Do
not condemn and you will not be condemned. Forgive and you will be forgiven"
(Matthew 7:1). But who said that anyway? Surely it was not the son of
God preaching tolerance. After all, we at Purdue know homosexuals are
sick and perverted because of what has been written in the Bible.
Our main question
is why stop there? Why only ship homosexuals to live in "camps?" This
is only a small beginning. Do not put a Band-Aid on a gaping chest wound.
The Jewish people have different beliefs. They too may be dangerous to
God-fearing America. So, too, we must eliminate Muslims, Atheists, Agnostics,
Buddhists, Hindus and Native Americans as well. They do not believe in
"our" God, so they obviously are also harmful.
Even that may not
end the moral decay in God-fearing America. Working mothers are an abomination
and must be punished. People who listen to heavy metal (the devil's music)
are dangerous. What about vegetarians? Everyone knows there is something
wrong with a person who cannot appreciate a good steak. Anyone who had
ever had a drink and then drove must be sent to "camp." Actually, just
drinking is bad enough. Smokers should be shot on sight. There is no reason
to even give them a trial. And finally, the people who take up a space
and a half in the parking garages must go. They are stealing from the
true, "saved" students at Purdue who pay dearly for the right to park.
This is only the
beginning of the "Final Solution." In the end, when America finally returns
to its God-fearing roots, there may only be us and you left. But we are
not too sure about you yet. After all, someone might not like how you
live your life either.
Don Malott Jr.
Graduate Student
Devon Hensel
Graduate Student
Erin Anderson
Graduate Student
Scouts have right to exclude
gays
In response to the
letter of Mr. Hoffman in the April 11 Exponent.
Mr. Hoffman wrote
in on a subject which has long been absent from our beloved editorial
page. That's right, he brought up the dead horse of Boy Scouts and homosexuality
and began to kick it. Well, since it's in the open, I'll take a kick too.
In his letter, Mr.
Hoffman brings up the point that the Boy Scouts are "seemingly a private
organization." No seemingly about it. They are a private organization,
in no way affiliated with the government. They get their money from private
donations, the United Way and fund raisers. As such, they can decide who
can and cannot be in their ranks. This is especially true seeing as the
positions homosexuals want are volunteer positions. They aren't losing
money, folks. The scouts can choose who they want in. They can hang a
"no gays" sign on the clubhouse door, and it's OK by me.
Also, lets
not bring up segregation. The issue is different. You are born black or
white. Despite what you may think, there is no proof that you are born
gay, so we have to assume that you aren't. That makes this case very different
from any in the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s
Andrew Moeschberger
sophomore, School
of Education
Resident supports American
unions
Universities have
a right to protect their public image and the reputations of their logos
by choosing carefully the manufacturers of their T-shirts and mugs, but
university officials are not advocates for enslaved workers of sweatshops.
Indiana University may be a charter member of the Worker Rights Consortium,
but that membership is about public image, not working conditions. This
former IU employee is resigned to the fact that IU officials, both past
and present, are unconcerned that office fumes left me in a life with
chronic health problems.
The best advocate
is a union, and American unions should globalize alongside American trade.
Although some unions have an unfortunate history of corruption, which
disenfranchises members, consider the teachers' union of Birmingham, Ala.
Last year, the school superintendent received a 20 percent, $30,000 raise,
which brought his annual salary to $181,000. Teachers received raises
1.5 percent or less; many classrooms lacked adequate supplies. The Alabama
Education Association initiated a strike. After two days, the school board
canceled the superintendent's raise and his contract extension.
Another employer
pulled the same stunt on me. His salary distribution disenfranchised me
and a few thousand committed employees. I can neither respect nor celebrate
such leadership. Since Birmingham, I have wondered whether a union would
have been able to help.
Thomas E. Kesler
West Lafayette
resident
Purdue leaders shouldn't mix
drinks
Just a couple of
statements that I feel must be said. I will try to be as respectable as
need be. With all the problems that college campuses are having with underage
drinking, alcohol related accidents and overdoses, public intoxication
and drunk driving; with all the thousands of families destroyed by alcoholics
and by drunk driving "murders"; what the hell are the Purdue Student Government's
president and vice president thinking by doing any kind of promotion that's
related to alcohol? Just the mere fact that the quality of their characters
did not guide them to think of these few reflections before deciding to
be proud and joyous as they were having their pictures taken for the newspaper
of them "mixing drinks" ought to be enough for people of conscience to
ask for their recognition.
Also, as a side note,
what kind of priority structure does the Purdue Exponent have by making
the picture of the above two bozos as top news and cover page picture
and putting a Purdue student hunger strike in support of ending sweatshop
conditions as a bottom of the front page (have to turn Exponent over from
distribution bin even to see it) article?
Kyle Anders
graduate student
Student agrees with view,
not proof
This is a letter
in response to Mr. Grindlife's column on April 5.
Although I applaud
his standpoint on homosexuality, I have objections to arguments presented
in his column.
First of all, his
arguments on reasons for pork chops being forbidden in the Old Testament
are far from convincing as he doesn't indicate the difference between
them and lamb or beef, and I find it hard to believe that adultery is
forbidden because of the STDs.
Also, I am yet to
see a holy book in any religion that lists a code of behavior and adds
a footnote saying "you may break these rules if you feel it won't harm."
And even if we were to believe that is in the spirit of the Bible, we
cannot expect that it was meant, "thou shall not kill, unless it won't
harm". And if we can believe that some rules can't be broken, others may
as well believe that the one about homosexuality can't be broken also.
And even if we were to convince all the Christians on this matter, we
are yet to convince followers of the other religions on Earth.
So, I believe that
the arguments against oppression of homosexuality must not rely on proving
that it is OK to be gay in any holy book but on emphasizing respect for
other people's choice of being "sinners" in spite of how much we want
to show that our religion and beliefs do not conflict.
Firat Celikler
graduate student
Local restaurants don't bother
reader
Olivia Conroy is
in the privileged position to speak her mind to all of us, and she uses
it to gripe because the city's restaurants aren't up to her standards.
I have enjoyed many columns on important and interesting issues in The
Exponent ... this was not one of them (Exponent column April 13).
If the dorm food
or McDonald's isn't to your liking, I suggest patronizing the nice ethnically-themed
evenings RHIT hosts, or even hop into you car and check out the many fine
local restaurants in Lafayette.
As for the poorer
students, like myself, Ramen noodles equal Chinese food and Kraft Dinner
equals Italian.
Mike Flaherty
junior, School
of Technology
Purdue should sponsor pep
rallies
As a Purdue student,
I would like to touch base on the riots. First of all, as we all know,
these riots were blown entirely out of proportion and both the students
and police were in the wrong at some point. Secondly, Purdue wonders why
we get out of control sometimes. Wisconsin, known for their obnoxious
fans, had very minimal damage. They had a big pep rally organized before
and publicized before the game for afterward in their football stadium
and I believe 20,000 people, many of them students, showed up. Has the
University ever thought of organizing something like that? Also, some
colleges have "bonfire" pits where they already have a place for a bonfire
to start and for the students to gather around so they won't have to do
it in the streets. The University just can't expect hundreds of police
to make the whole campus "calm." The students are going to be celebrating
no matter what, and it's partly the University's fault to be so ignorant
to these incidents. Police can't fix everything. Purdue is getting more
conservative, but they can't expect students to go that way also. That's
why we must have fun things organized, and it really doesn't take much.
Lannette Armstrong
sophomore, Schools
of Engineering
|
Editor's Note: The
deadline for submitting letters to the editor for the spring semester
is Friday, April 21. Letters submitted beyond this date will not
be accepted for publication.
|
|