 |
|
|
Friday, 4/13/01
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, 4/13/01
|
|
 University policies generate confusion I just wanted to question the legitimacy of the actions taken by Purdue University and the police department concerning the riots. I've seen fallacies. First, I'm a bit confused as to the actual damage done to the school. Originally there were estimates of $30-50,000, then the Exponent reported $60,000 as of Friday, as the police website reported $100,000. Perhaps the difference here lies in the overtime pay of the police. Moreover if $5,000 is given to those who rat people out and there are currently 160 pictures up, that is $800,000. Could the school afford to fulfill such a promise with Jischke begging for money with every speech he gives? This figure being much more than the riot cost (maybe, we still don't know exactly how much the riot cost). I'm actually inquiring about the clause "which leads to a conviction." I don't believe it's possible to convict on such evidence. Expulsion is a different matter altogether; however, it seems to me that those who rat people out are only getting them expelled, and I seriously doubt any of the $5,000 bounty offered. Purdue policies and law are two different matters, and, as they can expel rioters, convictions seem a bit farfetched. I say if greed is your sin, please consider this before you try and cash in. Greg Daly Sophomore, School of Liberal Arts |
Fountain fences will promote safety
Police use ineffective methods Chalkings disgrace, litter campus Hockey offers exciting experience Intolerance should target actions Hockey requires superior abilities University policies generate confusion
OPINIONS DESK PHONE: Opinions editor:
|
|||||
|
| ||||||
