The Purdue Exponent Online
Wednesday 6/6/2001
5 day quick link 6/4 | 6/1 | 5/30 | 5/25 | 5/23



City

Stronger courthouse security renders mixed opinions

By Jamie Teibel
Summer Editor

Disagreement is the word of the week at the Tippecanoe County Courthouse. The dispute between Tippecanoe County commissioners and Circuit Court Judge Ronald Melchiar began Monday, continued for about eight hours on Tuesday, and will conclude today, beginning at 8:30 a.m.

All who testified on Tuesday disagreed with Judge Melichar and his mandate to reduce access to the courthouse from eight doors, down to one or two.

Mrs. Betty Michael, who works in the clerk's office, said that if the security concentrates on one or two entrances, with so many employees, it would take longer for workers to enter the building, therefore starting their day later. Basically, Michael thinks the decision is "asinine."

Her testimony brought up the points of current security in the courthouse. According to those who testified, following the 1998 attempted bombing there was more security added to the courthouse. Security, such as panic buttons, portable metal detectors and hand-held detectors, that makes them all feel as though the courthouse sufficiently provides safety.

"I don't think it's perfect, or even will be perfect," said Lafayette mayor Dave Heath. He referred to the courthouse as "the heart of our community," and doesn't want access to it limited to one entrance.

Mayor Heath agreed with prosecutors, saying that weapons should be prohibited in the courthouse, but added, "You can bring in millions of dollars on security, but there is no guarantee." He said that the people who work in the courthouse and are part of the court and public systems should be aware of the risk involved.

Sheriff David Murtaugh, Lafayette Police Department, said that limiting the entrance to the courthouse poses a problem both for the public and the police officers. He said that the only place for those waiting to come into the courthouse is a small entryway, the rest would have to wait outside.

As for escorting prisoners, he said it would take longer for the police officers to bring them into the building because the prisoners would have to be moved a greater distance outside the courthouse. He does not believe the mandate is the answer to the security needs of the courthouse.

Three county commissioners came to a consensus, saying that it is unnecessary to close any of the doors of the courthouse and that other options should be considered.

Tippecanoe county judges Donald Johnson and Michael Morrissey also testified against the mandate.

Johnson said, "I feel that I and the public are safe in my courtroom, mostly because I have an armed bailiff," he said. He added that he has been threatened, but claims "it's part of the job."

Morissey also feels that he and the public are safe in his courtroom. "I have no reason to believe that anyone in the courtroom, including me, the staff and the defendants, are really in any danger," he said. Morissey added that his feeling of safety might be in part because of the armed bailiff.

Morissey concluded that he doesn't support Judge Malichar's mandate, but doesn’t oppose it either.

 

 

 

Related Coverage

Additional security provides unnecessary inconvenience

Headlines

Stronger courthouse security renders mixed opinions

Firefighters, police gather at torch relay

Lafayette council tables salary debate

Construction of drugstore to begin in fall

Board of Commissioners approve rezoning

Contact us

CITY DESK PHONE:
(765) 743-1111 ext. 250

To send a letter to the editor, please email opinions@purdueexponent.org

Extra

 







Purdue Exponent 2001