The Purdue Exponent Online
4/12/2002
Previous Edition 4/11


City

Libraries fight Internet filtering

By Emily Baldauf
Senior Writer

The outcome of a federal trial that questions the constitutionality of Internet filtering in public libraries could change the amount of information available to local library patrons.

The controversy that sparked the trial stems from the Children’s Internet Protection Act of 2000, which requires public libraries that receive certain types of federal funding to use Internet-filtering programs to block objectionable web sites.

The outcome of the trial could directly affect local libraries, including the Tippecanoe County Public Library. If the Children’s Internet Protection Act is not overturned, the library will lose approximately $5,500 in federal technology funding if they do not begin using Internet filtering software by July 2002.

"That is (such) a substantial amount of money that I think we would have to ask ourselves the question if we should filter," the head of technology services at the Tippecanoe county Public Library, Terry Travis, said.

Although the Tippecanoe County Library does not use Internet filtering, the library does have programs employed to protect children.

Assistant director at the Tippecanoe County Library, Scottie Patterson, said the Tippecanoe County Library has already dealt with the issue of protecting children who use the Internet by providing children with a special "children’s section." Patrons who use that section of the library are asked not to look at inappropriate sites while using those particular computers.

"There is no perfect filtering program available that I am aware of," Patterson said. "We ask that people visit sites that would be appropriate for a children’s area and most people are very willing to do that."

The Multnomah County, Ore., Public Library was also opposed to the forced filtering, so they teamed up with the American Library Association and the American Civil Liberties Union to fight the law they believe violates free speech.

Opponents to the Children’s Protection Act primarily argue the filtering often prohibits patrons from viewing educational sites about topics such as breast cancer and A.I.D.S. They believe library patrons should be offered a choice between filtered and unfiltered Internet access.

"There are some five-year-olds whose parents do not want them to know where babies come from, and there are some that do," testified Ginnie Cooper, director of the Multnomah, Ore., and County Library. "We don’t try to presume the values of parents."

Members of Purdue’s chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union are supporting the Union’s stance on the issue.

"It violates freedom of speech," Purdue’s ACLU technology chair Joe La Penna, who is a freshman in the School of Liberal Arts. "The CIPA is a very broad act that censors information from a moral standpoint rather than a legal standpoint. "

However, the government argues Internet filtering software is vital to protecting children from obscene web sites. They also argue the filtering programs have come a long way in recent years, and programs now limit fewer sites and give libraries the option of unblocking previously blocked sites.

Testimony in the trial ended last week, and a verdict is expected to be handed down by the end of May. Any type of appeal in this case would go directly to the Supreme Court.

As of now, Patterson said she believes the Tippecanoe County Library is in compliance with federal regulations, and she added the library reviews their policies every year in order to keep up with the changing regulations and needs of their patrons.

"The constitution does not prohibit people from accessing legal information," Patterson said. "It is very important for me as a librarian to offer people the information that is legal to obtain."

Since Purdue’s libraries are part of the University, they are not considered public libraries, and, therefore, do not have to comply with the Internet filtering provisions under the federal law. The University does not use any type of Internet filtering on any University computers at this time.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

 

 

 

Related Coverage

 

Headlines

Libraries fight Internet filtering

Contact us

CITY DESK PHONE:
(765) 743-1111 ext. 250

City editor: Matt Poston

To send a letter to the editor, please email opinions@purdueexponent.org

Extra





Purdue Exponent 2002