09-27-2004 Previous edition: 09-24-2004

























About Us

Advertising
Contact us
Letter Submit
Links


Printer-friendly version   

Machines won't leave paper trail

Your Sept. 20 editorial ("Machines will reduce errors in voting") paints a deceptively glowing picture of direct-recording electronic voting machines. Regardless of however easy to use they may be, it is grossly irresponsible to suggest that these machines without an automatically generated paper trail are acceptable for use. Without a paper trail, there is simply no way to verify that the machines have tabulated the correct results. The dangers are not limited to the threat of an attacker tampering with the machines; without a paper trail, it is impossible to recover the votes if the machine fails. As anyone who has ever used a computer can tell you, the one thing you can count on computers to do is to fail at the worst possible moment.

Merely saying "there hasn’t been a single case of vote tampering" isn’t good enough; any electronic machine failure that affects the outcome of the election is unacceptable. There are plenty of cases where this has happened in recent elections, see http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/23.51.html#subj2.1 for several examples.

Furthermore, it’s certainly possible that there have been cases of vote tampering that simply haven’t been detected. For example, http://www.blackboxvoting.org/?q=node/view/78 reports a backdoor in Diebold’s vote tabulating machines that allows the operator to select whatever election outcome he wants; more than 1000 of these machines are in use. Without an independently verifiable paper trail, there is no way to detect these sorts of errors and attacks.

If you believe that the machines are completely bug-free, entirely impervious to outside attack, developed by people of unimpeachable moral character, and built using hardware guaranteed never to fail, paperless electronic machines may look like a good idea. For those of us in the real world, however, such systems must be kept as far away from the voting booth as possible.

Paul Kuliniewicz
Graduate Student
Printer-friendly version   
Headlines
Editorial

Column

Reasons for war in Iraq hold up under international law

Letters

Caribbean kids grow up playing cricket also

Writers must debate polygamy with correct logic

Courtesy makes preacher approaches appreciable

Public must boycott CBS to make stand

People make best choices for selves Smoking law will infringe on rights

Machines won't leave paper trail



Contact Us
OPINIONS DESK PHONE:
(765) 743-1111

Opinions editor: Iris Tucker

To send a letter to the editor, please email opinions@purdueexponent.org



Web Design Training
Career Education
Interior Design Schools
Online Degrees
Graphic Design Schools
Fashion Design Schools
Nursing Schools
Cooking Schools


Make a Website
Go Karting Website
Holiday Villa Website
Bygga Hemsida
Antiques and Collectables


Find the Right School
Boost Your Career
Mechanic Schools
Veterinary Schools
Massage School


 
Prada Fendi Tods Handbag Sale
Comp Card & Zed Card Design
Model Comp Cards
Insurance News


Front Page | Campus | City | Features | Opinions | Sports | Classifieds
Advertising | Archive | Links | About us | Letter Submission Form

To report any errors with or to give ideas on how we can improve the online edition of The Exponent contact Online Production